The pages on Between Dates mix stable guidance with choices that depend on circumstance. Current outside facts are checked when necessary; recommendations are explained as recommendations, not disguised as universal rules.
The standard for a useful page
When a page includes service features, prices, schedules, venue details, and other outside information that can change, the current claim needs suitable support. Stable explanation does not need a decorative citation simply to look researched.
When verification matters
Many guides involve choices rather than hard facts. In those cases the page should explain the reasoning, trade-offs, and limits behind a recommendation instead of pretending there is one answer for everyone.
Examples are there to make a distinction easier to understand. They should not be presented as testimonials, interviews, or real events unless the source material actually establishes that.
Where editorial judgment belongs
A material factual error should be corrected or removed. A passage can also be revised when it is technically accurate but unclear, repetitive, or too broad for the page it appears on.
Good editing is less about making every article look alike and more about making each page answer its own question cleanly.